TIGblogs TIG | TIGblogs GROUP TIGBLOGS LOGIN SIGNUP
Leks
Leks
« previous 5


unirse al ejército o a una milicia es la única forma que los niños soldados tienen de sobrevivir

Entrevista a Farida Chapman, cooperante que trabaja con niños soldado en la República Democrática del Congo

“En ocasiones, unirse al ejército o a una milicia es la única forma que los niños soldados tienen de sobrevivir”

Los Gobiernos de al menos diez países utilizan a menores de 18 años para combatir en algunos de los casi 40 conflictos que aún existen en el mundo, según ha denunciado la Coalición para acabar con la utilización de Niños Soldados, formada por Amnistía Internacional y Save the Children España.

Para Farida Chapman, dieciséis años de experiencia y coordinadora de tres organizaciones humanitarias internacionales que desarrollan programas de desmovilizacion y reintegracion de estos niños soldado en el este de la República Democrática del Congo, “los Gobiernos del mundo siguen poniendo en peligro a las futuras generaciones”.

Chapman, que ha participado en el lanzamiento internacional del informe, arroja, efectivametne, datos escalofriantes. Hoy, más de 300.000 menores se encuentran en primera línea de fuego, denuncia Amnistía Internacional. En Burundi, la República Democrática del Congo, Costa de Marfil, Guinea, Liberia, Myanmar, Ruanda, Uganda, Sudán y… Estados Unidos. Arrancados en la mayoría de los casos de sus hogares, son entrenados para combatir y forzados a matar. Expuestos a todo tipo de violencia, acabado el conflicto estos niños soldado no tienen, en ningún caso, fácil su regreso a la infancia.

¿Cuál debería ser la prioridad de la Coalición para acabar con la utilizacion de niños soldados?

La Coalición debe asegurarse de que todos los países ratifiquen el Protocolo Opcional de la Convención de Derechos del Niño de Naciones Unidas, que prohíbe el uso directo de menores de 18 años en hostilidades, y confirmar que lo cumplen, porque hay mucha impunidad y no es suficiente sólo con la firma de documentos legales. Además, es necesaria una mayor presión internacional y una mayor concienciación de la opinión pública.

¿Cuáles son las causas que fuerzan a los menores a convertirse en soldados?

Hay un número importante de niños que son forzados y secuestrados, que no tienen otra oportunidad. Que son arrancados de sus hogares, de sus familias, de las escuelas y que son drogados y lanzados al frente de batalla; pero otros muchos, al menos en la República Democrática del Congo, se unen voluntariamente por culpa de la pobreza extrema. Muchas veces no tienen otras alternativas viables más que unirse a la vida militar, porque un niño soldado tiene mejor acceso a agua, comida, poder, prestigio y un mayor estatus que cualquier otro menor. En ocasiones, unirse al ejército o a una milicia es la única forma que tienen de sobrevivir.

¿Qué pasa con un niño cuando se desmoviliza?

El trabajo de reinserción es muy duro y complicado. Es un trabajo a largo plazo y debe contarse con un apoyo del entorno. Generalmente, la comunidad tampoco sabe cómo tratarlos porque estos niños son víctimas, pero también son personas que cometen crímenes de guerra y es difícil perdonar y olvidar. A veces la comunidad es muy rencorosa. Creo que la principal prioridad con estos niños es mantenerlos ocupados, considerarlos iguales que otros niños y trabajar para que crezcan, favoreciendo su educación.

¿Qué es lo que los niños soldados encuentran más difícil al ser reincorporados a su comunidad?

Encuentran muy difícil volver a ser niños. Acostumbrarse a no tener lo que tenían en los grupos armados, hacerse a la idea de que no pueden tener más, ni siquiera lo mismo, de lo que tenían cuando se unieron a la armada. Tienen que comportarse como jovenes adultos. Para ellos es muy difícil renunciar, por ejemplo, a lo que podian conseguir con un arma.

¿Cual es su experiencia con ellos?

Al contrario de lo que pensamos en los países ricos, el trauma que estos niños sufren está muy ligado al contexto en el que viven. Lo que podría ser una experiencia traumática para nosotros, no necesariamente lo es para estos niños en el Congo o en Sierra Leona. Si la mayoria de las personas de la comunidad ha sufrido los efectos de una guerra es paradógicamente más fácil para ellos superar este trauma porque todos lo han vivido. Lo mas relevante que he descubierto al hacer este trabajo es que hay que regresar a lo esencial. Estos niños necesitan un hogar, necesitan familias que los quieran, necesitan cosas que hacer, necesitan educación, y si tenemos los recursos para ofrecerles algo más, todavia mejor, pero realmente necesitan lo básico... lo que cualquier otro niño.

¿Tienen el apoyo del Gobierno para implementar los programas de reinserción?

En el caso de la RDC, el Gobierno tiene muchos problemas para controlar todo el territorio y esto se refleja no sólo en los niños soldados sino también en muchos otros asuntos. Así que es muy difícil conseguir un compromiso real de desmovilización... aunque en sus declaraciones públicas se muestran favorables. Es complicado que para ellos sea una prioridad si están viviendo crisis humanitarias o conflictos sangrientos. Lo verdaderamente importante es involucrar a todos, que compartan la voluntad de desarmar a los menores y poner fin a la guerra.

¿Qué puede hacer la opinión pública para ayudar a los niños soldados?

Creo que debemos ser mucho más conscientes sobre lo que hacemos, lo que usamos y de dónde viene. Por ejemplo, no soy una experta en el comercio de diamantes, pero al haber trabajado en Sierra Leona, sé que hay un sistema llamado el Proceso de Kimberley que busca establecer el origen de los llamados diamantes sangrientos que provienen de zonas en conflicto. Por ejemplo, en Europa podríamos ser más exigentes y pedir garantías sobre el origen de los diamantes. Y lo mismo podríamos hacer con los recursos minerales que se usan. Por ejemplo, para construir una habitacion, la madera probablemente proviene del Congo, los minerales que se utilizan para fabricar nuestros teléfonos móviles también... pero nadie lo sabe. Así que tenemos una responsabilidad de crear conciencia en nosotros mismos, en nuestra sociedad, y exigir transparencia. Ése podría ser un primer paso.

¿Qué mensaje quiere enviar a la opinión pública?

Que sea más transparente a la hora de atajar estos problemas relacionados con la guerra y el hambre. De nuevo, los niños soldados son sólo la punta del iceberg. Vamos a curar las causas de estas guerras y sabremos que somos mucho más responsables de estos problemas de lo que pensamos.

Fecha Publicación: 24/11/2004
Laura R. Salazar y Ángel Gonzalo
Periodistas

http://www.infosolidaria.org/verarticulo.php?idarticulo=812&idautor=99&idversion=0&ididioma=1

November 30, 2004 | 2:02 PM Comments  0 comments

Tags:


Surgimiento y Caída del Imperio Maya



Científicos utilizan satélites espaciales para desentrañar uno de los grandes misterios del mundo antiguo.


NASA

Noviembre 15, 2004: Donde hoy existen las selvas tropicales de Guatemala, una gran civilización floreció hace muchos años. La gente de la sociedad Maya construyó grandes ciudades, templos suntuosos y pirámides elevadas. En su esplendor, alrededor del año 900 D.C., la población se estimaba en unas 200 personas por km cuadrado en las áreas rurales, y más de 800 personas por km cuadrado en las ciudades -- comparable al moderno Condado de Los Ángeles.

Este vibrante "Periodo Clásico" de la civilización Maya prosperó por seis siglos. Entonces, por alguna razón, se derrumbó.

Por mucho tiempo, la caída de los Mayas ha sido uno de los grandes misterios del mundo antiguo. Es, sin embargo, algo más que una curiosidad histórica. A la vista de las ruinas Mayas, en la región de Petén, en Guatemala, cerca de la frontera con México, la población se está incrementando de nuevo, y está talando la selva tropical para convertirla en tierra de cultivo.

"Estudiando qué fue lo que los Mayas hicieron bien y qué hicieron mal, tal vez podamos ayudar a los habitantes locales a encontrar formas eficientes de cultivar la tierra, sin llegar a los excesos que condenaron a los Mayas" dice Tom Sever del Centro Marshall de Vuelos Espaciales (MSFC).

Sever, el único arqueólogo de la NASA, ha estado utilizando satélites para analizar las ruinas Mayas. Al combinar esa información con descubrimientos convencionales arqueológicos de las excavaciones, Sever y otros han logrado descifrar gran parte de lo que realmente ocurrió:

Por el polen atrapado en antiguas capas de sedimento del lago, los científicos se han enterado de que hace aproximadamente 1200 años, justo antes de la caída de la civilización, el polen de los árboles desapareció casi por completo y fue reemplazado por polen de maleza. En otras palabras, la región se encontraba deforestada casi en su totalidad.

Sin los árboles, la erosión habría empeorado, llevándose la capa de suelo fértil. La cambiante superficie habría aumentado la temperatura de la región hasta en 6 grados, de acuerdo con simulaciones por computador efectuadas por el científico del clima Bob Oglesby de la NASA, colega de Sever en el MSFC. Esas temperaturas más cálidas habrían secado la tierra, haciéndola aún menos propicia para cultivos.

El incremento en las temperaturas también habría desestabilizado los patrones de precipitación pluvial, dice Oglesby. Durante la temporada seca en el Petén, el agua escasea, y el agua subterránea está demasiado profunda (+150 metros) como para perforar pozos. Morir de sed es una amenaza real. Para sobrevivir, los Mayas debieron recurrir a agua de lluvia almacenada en estanques, de tal manera que una alteración en las lluvias habría tenido consecuencias fatales.

(Estudios recientes demuestran que están ocurriendo cambios en la formación de nubes y en las lluvias sobre partes deforestadas de América Central. ¿Se repite la historia?)

Usando técnicas clásicas de arqueología, los investigadores han descubierto que los huesos humanos de las últimas décadas, anteriores al colapso de la civilización, muestran signos de una desnutrición severa.

"Los arqueólogos solían debatir acerca de si el derrumbe de los Mayas se debió a sequía, guerra o enfermedad, o a un número de otras posibilidades tales como la inestabilidad política", comenta Sever. "Ahora creemos que todos estos factores estuvieron implicados, pero eran solamente los síntomas. La causa principal fue una escasez crónica de alimento y agua, debido a cierta combinación de la sequía natural y la deforestación ocasionada por los seres humanos".

En la actualidad, la selva tropical está cayendo otra vez bajo el hacha. En los últimos 40 años, se ha destruido casi la mitad de la selva, cortada por los granjeros que practican la agricultura de "tala y quema": se derriba una parte de la selva y se quema para exponer el suelo con el fin de sembrar cultivos. Es la ceniza la que le da fertilidad al suelo, de tal manera que en un plazo de 3 a 5 años el suelo se agota, obligando al granjero a seguir avanzando, derribando una nueva sección. Este ciclo se repite indefinidamente... o hasta que la selva se termine. Si continúan los índices actuales de destrucción, para el 2020, solo quedará del 2% al 16% de la selva tropical original.

Al parecer, la gente moderna está repitiendo algunos de los errores de los Mayas. Pero Sever cree que se puede evitar el desastre si los investigadores logran descubrir lo que los Mayas hicieron correctamente. ¿Cómo pudieron prosperar por tantos siglos? Una pista importante llega desde el espacio:

Sever y su colaborador Dan Irwin han observado fotos satelitales y, en ellas, Sever localizó indicios de antiguos canales de drenaje y riego en áreas semi-pantanosas cerca de las ruinas Mayas. Los residentes actuales hacen poco uso de estos pantanos de baja altitud (a los que ellos llaman "bajos"), y por mucho tiempo, los arqueólogos dieron por hecho que los Mayas tampoco los habían aprovechado. Durante la temporada de lluvias de junio a diciembre, los bajos son muy fangosos, y en la temporada seca se deshidratan. Ninguna de las dos condiciones es buena para cultivos.

Sever supone que estos canales antiguos fueron parte de un sistema diseñado por los Mayas para dirigir el agua hacia los bajos de modo que pudieran cultivar esta tierra. Los bajos cubren el 40% del paisaje; la utilización de esta inmensa área de tierra para la agricultura habría dado a los Mayas un mayor y más estable suministro de alimentos. Habrían podido cultivar la región montañosa durante la temporada lluviosa y los bajos durante la temporada seca. Además habrían podido cultivar los bajos año tras año, en lugar de derribar y quemar nuevas secciones de selva tropical.

¿Pueden los actuales granjeros de Petén aprender una lección de los Mayas y sembrar sus semillas en los bajos?

Es una idea inquietante. Sever y sus colegas están estudiando esta posibilidad con el Ministro de Agricultura de Guatemala. Colaboran con Pat Culbert de la Universidad de Arizona y Vilma Fialko del Instituto de Antropología e Historia de Guatemala para identificar áreas en los bajos con suelo apropiado. Entre sus planes está el plantar cosechas de prueba en esas áreas, con canales de riego y drenaje inspirados por los Mayas.

Un mensaje del año 900 A.C.: nunca es demasiado tarde para aprender de nuestros antepasados.

Créditos y Contactos

Autor: Dr. Tony Phillips
Funcionario Responsable de NASA: Ron Koczor
Editor de Producción: Dr. Tony Phillips
Curador: Bryan Walls
Relaciones con los Medios: Steve Roy Traducción al Español: Ma. Luisa Hernández/Carlos Román
Editor en Español: Héctor Medina
El Directorio de Ciencias del Centro Marshall para Vuelos Espaciales de la NASA patrocina el Portal de Internet de Science@NASA que incluye a Ciencia@NASA. La misión de Ciencia@NASA es ayudar al público a entender cuán emocionantes son las investigaciones que se realizan en la NASA y colaborar con los científicos en su labor de difusión.

http://ciencia.msfc.nasa.gov/headlines/y2004/15nov_maya.htm?list1153025

November 25, 2004 | 4:51 PM Comments  0 comments

Tags:


In Falluja, Young Marines Saw the Savagery of an Urban War

The New York Times
November 21, 2004

By DEXTER FILKINS

FALLUJA, Iraq, Nov. 18 - Eight days after the Americans entered the city on foot, a pair of marines wound their way up the darkened innards of a minaret, shot through with holes by an American tank.

As the marines inched upward, a burst of gunfire rang down, fired by an insurgent hiding in the top of the tower. The bullets hit the first marine in the face, his blood spattering the marine behind him. The marine in the rear tumbled backward down the stairwell, while Lance Cpl. William Miller, age 22, lay in silence halfway up, mortally wounded.

"Miller!" the marines called from below. "Miller!"

With that, the marines' near mystical commandment against leaving a comrade behind seized the group. One after another, the young marines dashed into the minaret, into darkness and into gunfire, and wound their way up the stairs.

After four attempts, Corporal Miller's lifeless body emerged from the tower, his comrades choking and covered with dust. With more insurgents closing in, the marines ran through volleys of machine-gun fire back to their base.

"I was trying to be careful, but I was trying to get him out, you know what I'm saying?" Lance Cpl. Michael Gogin, 19, said afterward.

So went eight days of combat for this Iraqi city, the most sustained period of street-to-street fighting that Americans have encountered since the Vietnam War. The proximity gave the fighting a hellish intensity, with soldiers often close enough to look their enemies in the eyes.

For a correspondent who has covered a half dozen armed conflicts, including the war in Iraq since its start in March 2003, the fighting seen while traveling with a frontline unit in Falluja was a qualitatively different experience, a leap into a different kind of battle.

From the first rockets vaulting out of the city as the marines moved in, the noise and feel of the battle seemed altogether extraordinary; at other times, hardly real at all. The intimacy of combat, this plunge into urban warfare, was new to this generation of American soldiers, but it is a kind of fighting they will probably see again: a grinding struggle to root out guerrillas entrenched in a city, on streets marked in a language few American soldiers could comprehend.

The price for the Americans so far: 51 dead and 425 wounded, a number that may yet increase but that already exceeds the toll from any battle in the Iraq war.

Marines in Harm's Way

The 150 marines with whom I traveled, Bravo Company of the First Battalion, Eighth Marines, had it as tough as any unit in the fight. They moved through the city almost entirely on foot, into the heart of the resistance, rarely protected by tanks or troop carriers, working their way through Falluja's narrow streets with 75-pound packs on their backs.

In eight days of fighting, Bravo Company took 36 casualties, including 6 dead, meaning that the unit's men had about a one-in-four chance of being wounded or killed in little more than a week.

The sounds, sights and feel of the battle were as old as war itself, and as new as the Pentagon's latest weapons systems. The eerie pop from the cannon of the AC-130 gunship, prowling above the city at night, firing at guerrillas who were often only steps away from Americans on the ground. The weird buzz of the Dragon Eye pilotless airplane, hovering over the battlefield as its video cameras beamed real-time images back to the base.

The glow of the insurgents' flares, throwing daylight over a landscape to help them spot their targets: us.

The nervous shove of a marine scrambling for space along a brick wall as tracer rounds ricocheted above.

The silence between the ping of the shell leaving its mortar tube and the explosion when it strikes.

The screams of the marines when one of their comrades, Cpl. Jake Knospler, lost part of his jaw to a hand grenade.

"No, no, no!" the marines shouted as they dragged Corporal Knospler from the darkened house where the bomb went off. It was 2 a.m., the sky dark without a moon. "No, no, no!"

Nothing in the combat I saw even remotely resembled the scenes regularly flashed across movie screens; even so, they often seemed no more real.

Mortar shells and rocket-propelled grenades began raining down on Bravo Company the moment its men began piling out of their troop carriers just outside Falluja. The shells looked like Fourth of July bottle rockets, sailing over the ridge ahead as if fired by children, exploding in a whoosh of sparks.

Whole buildings, minarets and human beings were vaporized in barrages of exploding shells. A man dressed in a white dishdasha crawled across a desolate field, reaching behind a gnarled plant to hide, when he collapsed before a burst of fire from an American tank.

Sometimes the casualties came in volleys, like bursts of machine-gun fire. On the first morning of battle, during a ferocious struggle for the Muhammadia Mosque, about 45 marines with Bravo Company's Third Platoon dashed across 40th Street, right into interlocking streams of fire. By the time the platoon made it to the other side, five men lay bleeding in the street.

The marines rushed out to get them, as they would days later in the minaret, but it was too late for Sgt. Lonny Wells, who bled to death on the side of the road. One of the men who braved gunfire to pull in Sergeant Wells was Cpl. Nathan Anderson, who died three days later in an ambush.

Sergeant Wells's death dealt the Third Platoon a heavy blow; as a leader of one of its squads, he had written letters to the parents of its younger members, assuring them he would look over them during the tour in Iraq.

"He loved playing cards," Cpl. Gentian Marku recalled. "He knew all the probabilities."

More than once, death crept up and snatched a member of Bravo Company and quietly slipped away. Cpl. Nick Ziolkowski, nicknamed Ski, was a Bravo Company sniper. For hours at a stretch, Corporal Ziolkowski would sit on a rooftop, looking through the scope on his bolt-action M-40 rifle, waiting for guerrillas to step into his sights. The scope was big and wide, and Corporal Ziolkowski often took off his helmet to get a better look.

Tall, good-looking and gregarious, Corporal Ziolkowski was one of Bravo Company's most popular soldiers. Unlike most snipers, who learned to shoot growing up in the countryside, Corporal Ziolkowski grew up near Baltimore, unfamiliar with guns. Though Baltimore boasts no beach front, Corporal Ziolkowski's passion was surfing; at Camp Lejeune, N.C., Bravo Company's base, he would often organize his entire day around the tides.

"All I need now is a beach with some waves," Corporal Ziolkowski said, during a break from his sniper duties at Falluja's Grand Mosque, where he killed three men in a single day.

During that same break, Corporal Ziolkowski foretold his own death. The snipers, he said, were now among the most hunted of American soldiers.

In the first battle for Falluja, in April, American snipers had been especially lethal, Corporal Ziolkowski said, and intelligence officers had warned him that this time, the snipers would be targets.

"They are trying to take us out," Corporal Ziolkowski said.

The bullet knocked Corporal Ziolkowski backward and onto the roof. He had been sitting there on the outskirts of the Shuhada neighborhood, an area controlled by insurgents, peering through his wide scope. He had taken his helmet off to get a better view. The bullet hit him in the head.

Young Men, Heavy Burdens

For all the death about the place, one inescapable impression left by the marines was their youth. Everyone knows that soldiers are young; it is another thing to see men barely out of adolescence, many of whom were still in high school when this war began, shoot people dead.

The marines of Bravo Company often fought over the packets of M&M's that came with their rations. Sitting in their barracks, they sang along with the Garth Brooks paean to chewing tobacco, "Copenhagen," named for the brand they bought almost to a man:

Copenhagen, what a wad of flavor

Copenhagen, you can see it in my smile

Copenhagen, hey do yourself a favor, dip

Copenhagen, it drives the cowgirls wild

One of Bravo Company's more youthful members was Cpl. Romulo Jimenez II, age 21 from Bellington, W.Va.. Cpl. Jimenez spent much of his time showing off his tattoos - he had flames climbing up one of his arms - and talking about his 1992 Ford Mustang. He was a popular member of Bravo Company's Second Platoon, not least because he introduced his sister to a fellow marine, Lance Cpl. Sean Evans, and the couple married.

In the days before the battle started, Corporal Jimenez called his sister, Katherine, to ask that she fix up the interior of his Mustang before he got home.

"Make it look real nice," he told her.

On Wednesday, Nov. 10, around 2 p.m., Corporal Jimenez was shot in the neck by a sniper as he advanced with his platoon through the northern end of Falluja, just near the green-domed Muhammadia Mosque. He died instantly.

Despite their youth, the marines seemed to tower over their peers outside the military in maturity and guts. Many of Bravo Company's best marines, its most proficient killers, were 19 and 20 years old; some directed their comrades in maneuvers and assaults. Bravo Company's three lieutenants, each responsible for the lives of about 50 men, were 23 and 24 years old.

They are a strangely anonymous bunch. The men who fight America's wars seem invariably to come from little towns and medium-size cities far away from the nation's arteries along the coast. Line up a group of marines and ask them where they are from, and they will give you a list of places like Pearland, Tex.; Lodi, Ohio; Osawatomie, Kan.

Typical of the marines who fought in Falluja was Chad Ritchie, a 22-year-old corporal from Keezletown, Va. Corporal Ritchie, a soft-spoken, bespectacled intelligence officer, said he was happy to be out of the tiny place where he grew up, though he admitted that he sometimes missed the good times on Friday nights in the fields.

"We'd have a bonfire, and back the trucks up on it, and open up the backs, and someone would always have some speakers," Corporal Ritchie said. "We'd drink beer, tell stories."

Like many of the young men in Bravo Company, Corporal Ritchie said he had joined the Marines because he yearned for an adventure greater than his small town could offer.

"The guys who stayed, they're all living with their parents, making $7 an hour," Corporal Ritchie said. "I'm not going to be one of those people who gets old and says, 'I wish I had done this. I wish I had done that.' Every once in a while, you've got to do something hard, do something you're not comfortable with. A person needs a gut check."

Holding Up Under Fire

Marines like Corporal Ritchie proved themselves time and again in Falluja, but they were not without fear. While camped out one night in the Iraqi National Guard building in the middle of city, Bravo Company came under mortar fire that grew closer with each shot. The insurgents were "bracketing" the building, firing shots to the left and right of the target and adjusting their fire each time.

In the hallways, where the men had camped for the night, the murmured sounds of prayers rose between the explosions. After 20 tries, the shelling inexplicably stopped.

On one particularly grim night, a group of marines from Bravo Company's First Platoon turned a corner in the darkness and headed up an alley. As they did so, they came across men dressed in uniforms worn by the Iraqi National Guard. The uniforms were so perfect that they even carried pieces of red tape and white, the signal agreed upon to assure American soldiers that any Iraqis dressed that way would be friendly; the others could be killed.

The marines, spotting the red and white tape, waved, and the men in Iraqi uniforms opened fire. One American, Corporal Anderson, died instantly. One of the wounded men, Pfc. Andrew Russell, lay in the road, screaming from a nearly severed leg.

A group of marines ran forward into the gunfire to pull their comrades out. But the ambush, and the enemy flares and gunfire that followed, rattled the men of Bravo Company more than any event. In the darkness, the men began to argue. Others stood around in the road. As the platoon's leader, Lt. Andy Eckert, struggled to take charge, the Third Platoon seemed on the brink of panic.

"Everybody was scared," Lieutenant Eckert said afterward. "If the leader can't hold, then the unit can't hold together."

The unit did hold, but only after the intervention of Bravo Company's commanding officer, Capt. Read Omohundro.

Time and again through the week, Captain Omohundro kept his men from folding, if not by his resolute manner then by his calmness under fire. In the first 16 hours of battle, when the combat was continuous and the threat of death ever present, Captain Omohundro never flinched, moving his men through the warrens and back alleys of Falluja with an uncanny sense of space and time, sensing the enemy, sensing the location of his men, even in the darkness, entirely self-possessed.

"Damn it, get moving," Captain Omohundro said, and his men, looking relieved that they had been given direction amid the anarchy, were only too happy to oblige.

A little later, Captain Omohundro, a 34-year-old Texan, allowed that the strain of the battle had weighed on him, but he said that he had long ago trained himself to keep any self-doubt hidden from view.

"It's not like I don't feel it," Captain Omohundro said. "But if I were to show it, the whole thing would come apart."

When the heavy fighting was finally over, a dog began to follow Bravo Company through Falluja's broken streets. First it lay down in the road outside one of the buildings the company had occupied, between troop carriers. Then, as the troops moved on, the mangy dog slinked behind them, first on a series of house searches, then on a foot patrol, always keeping its distance, but never letting the marines out of its sight.

Bravo Company, looking a bit ragged itself as it moved up through Falluja, momentarily fell out of its single-file line.

"Keep a sharp eye," Captain Omohundro told his men. "We ain't done with this war yet."

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/21/international/middleeast/21battle.html?hp&ex=1101099600&en=bc339766506f30ca&ei=5094&partner=homepage
Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company

November 21, 2004 | 5:55 PM Comments  0 comments

Tags:


Bill Clears Way for Government to Cut Back College Loans

The New York Times
November 21, 2004

By GREG WINTER and DIANA JEAN SCHEMO

The federal government will be able to require millions of college students to shoulder more of the cost of their education under the new spending bill approved yesterday by the House and Senate.

The government moved to change its formula for college aid last year, but was blocked by Congress. Now, however, no such language appears in the appropriations bill lawmakers are considering, clearing the way for the government to scale back college grants for hundreds of thousands of low-income students.

Nearly 100,000 more students may lose their federal grants entirely, as Congress considers legislation that could place more of the financial burden for college on students and their families.

The cutback stems from a revision to the formula governing virtually all of the nation's financial aid. Last year, the Department of Education changed the formula on its own, angering members of Congress who contended that it was a backdoor way of cutting education spending without facing the public. The department retorted that it was merely following the law.

In response, Congress passed legislation in the fall of 2003 to suspend the new formula for at least a year. The Senate put forward the same measure this year, and many members of the House said they also expected the new formula would wait at least until Congress updates the Higher Education Act, which will probably take the better part of the coming year.

But keeping the old formula in place for another year would add an extra $300 million in grants for college students to a program that is already running at a shortfall, the Office of Management and Budget said. So, the bill approved yesterday, brokered by Congressional leaders in a conference committee, eliminates a provision that would have barred the Education Department from changing the eligibility formula. A Senate staff member who spoke on the condition of anonymity said that the White House insisted the provision be dropped, citing the shortfall, and House Republicans were adamant in their agreement to do so.

"They are throwing students out of the opportunity to seek a college education," said Senator Jon S. Corzine, the New Jersey Democrat who wrote the amendment to stop the changes last year, and introduced a similar provision this year that did not survive the conference committee. "It is now clear to me that this was a backdoor attempt to cut funding from the Pell grant program."

The exact impact of the new rules is difficult to predict, but had the new formula gone into effect last year, it would have prevented about $270 million from being spent on Pell grants, the nation's primary scholarship program, the Congressional Research Service found. Many students, perhaps more than a million, would have received smaller grants, many education experts estimated. And about 84,000 students would have lost their Pell grants altogether, the research service reported.

Brian K. Fitzgerald, director of the Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance, which Congress created to advise it on student aid, estimated that the $300 million the administration hopes to save in the coming year will very likely mean that more than 90,000 students, largely among those whose parents earn $35,000 to $40,000 a year, would lose their Pell grants.

Whether furnished by colleges, states or the federal government, the vast majority of the nation's $110 billion in financial aid is dictated by an intricate federal formula. Its purpose is to calculate how much of a family's income is truly discretionary, and therefore eligible for covering college expenses.

Much like federal income tax, the formula allows families to deduct some of what they pay in state taxes. But last year the department significantly reduced that amount, in some cases cutting it in half, leaving families with more money left over to pay for college, at least on paper.

The problem, many members of Congress contend, is that state taxes have gone up for the last three years, not down, making the new formula out of step with the economic environment families currently face. With the issue seemingly on hold, the Department of Education said in June that it would review the formula and seek guidance on its fairness.

Without instructions from Congress to the contrary, however, department officials said that they would most likely start using a new formula, as required by law. Its effect on students could vary greatly from family to family, depending on their economic circumstances. But assuming that the department uses figures that are similar to the ones it proposed last year, as many as 1.2 million low-income students could have their grants cut, according to the American Council on Education, which represents colleges.

That does not mean that the government will end up spending less money on college scholarships than it has in prior years. In fact, significant increases in the number of low-income students going to college, and the recent economic woes of students and parents who might not have been eligible for help in the past, means that the government spent more than $13 billion on Pell grants in 2004, up from about $10 billion in 2001, department statistics show.


http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/21/education/21pell.html
Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company

November 21, 2004 | 5:53 PM Comments  0 comments

Tags:


School District Challenges Darwin's Theory


The New York Times
November 21, 2004

By REUTERS

PHILADELPHIA, Nov. 20 - A Pennsylvania school district Friday defended its decision to discount Charles Darwin's theory of evolution and teach what critics say is a version of creationism.

The district, the Dover Area School District in south-central Pennsylvania, is believed to be the first in the country to approve the teaching of a new theory called intelligent design, the National Center for Science Education said.

Proponents of the theory argue that the complexity of nature is such that it could not have occurred by chance, as Darwin held, and so must have been created by some all-powerful force.

The National Center for Science Education, an organization based in Oakland, Calif., that defends the teaching of evolution, said the district's board approved the policy change last month after a debate that began more than a year ago when a board member objected to a biology textbook because it focused on Darwinism.

The move prompted at least two members of the school board to resign. On Friday, the district defended its decision by issuing a statement saying it intends to present a balanced view and not to teach religious beliefs.

Officials will "make sure no one is promoting but also not inhibiting religion," the statement, which was posted on the district's Web site, says. It also says, "Because Darwin's theory is a theory, it is still being tested as new evidence is discovered."

Many educators, however, see intelligent design as a thinly veiled version of creationism, whose supporters believe the earth was made by God as described in the Book of Genesis.

"Intelligent design is creationism in a cheap tuxedo," said Nick Matzke, a spokesman for the science education group. "If there was a court case, it would not be found constitutional."


Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company

November 21, 2004 | 5:51 PM Comments  0 comments

Tags:


« previous 5


Jesús Alejandro Hernández Ramírez's Profile

Jesús Alejandro Hernández Ramírez's Friends


Latest Posts
Kamel Nacif, de...
Bolivia: los...
Trabajadores de día,...
Chiesa e pedofilia: il...
A casualty of free speech

Monthly Archive
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
February 2005
March 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005

Change Language


Filter By Type
Topics

Friends
Cat-Dan Lai-Smith
ebbyneza
Edu
Francis
hmm?
Hugh Switzer
Jarra McGrath
Jose Menacho Galiano
Mariana Ballestero
Michael Newton-McLaughlin
sean jayasekara
Stefanie
Vladimir


82782 views
Important Disclaimer